Daria Lysenko 21.09.202622.09.2026

Obtaining crypto licenses, white label consulting,
ICO/STO, supporting NFT marketplaces, drafting policies
for crypto projects, DAOs, and gamify projects

A VASP (Virtual Asset Service Provider) license is an official permission that gives a company the right to legally provide services related to cryptocurrencies and other virtual assets.

After the recommendations of the FATF (Financial Action Task Force), most countries began to regulate crypto businesses in the same way as the traditional financial sector. Today, companies operating with digital assets are mostly classified as VASPs and must obtain a corresponding license or undergo state registration. According to the FATF assessment, as of 2025, 33% of jurisdictions in the world were assessed as meeting or mostly meeting the requirement to require VASPs to be licensed or registered. At that, the share of jurisdictions deemed largely compliant with FATF Recommendation 15 grew from 25% in 2024 to 29% in 2025.

Cryptocurrency exchanges, custodial wallets, crypto-payment services, and other service providers in the field of digital assets cannot operate legally without a corresponding license. Its absence can lead to fines, restrictions from banks, loss of business reputation, and actual disconnection from the traditional financial system.

At the same time, a VASP license is not just a formal requirement. For the market, it is a confirmation of reliability, transparency, and responsible business conduct.

Licensed companies are obliged to implement effective anti-money laundering (AML) procedures, verify customers (KYC), carry out financial monitoring, and fulfill regulatory requirements at the level of traditional financial institutions.

Compliance with these standards increases the trust of banks, investors, partners, and users. In modern conditions, a VASP license has become not only a legal necessity but also an important competitive advantage. For companies planning to enter the crypto market, scale internationally, or cooperate with institutional clients, obtaining a license is no longer an option but a necessary condition for long-term development.

Key Advantages of a License

Obtaining a VASP license opens up significantly more opportunities for crypto companies than just compliance with legislation.

Access to new markets

In many countries, the license allows officially working in several markets at once. For example, within the framework of the European MiCA regulation, one CASP (Crypto-Asset Service Provider) license gives the right to provide services in all 27 countries of the European Union. This opens access to a market with over 450 million potential clients.

Greater trust from clients and partners

A licensed company evokes more trust among users, banks, payment systems, and investors. Regulatory control confirms that the business operates transparently, complies with international standards, and meets legislative requirements. This significantly simplifies the establishment of partnership relations, which are often unavailable to unlicensed companies.

Fewer legal risks

Obtaining a license involves compliance with AML, KYC, and other regulatory rules. This helps minimize the risk of fines, audits, suspension of activity, or other sanctions by regulators. Working within a clear legal framework provides the company with stability and predictability.

Easier access to banking services

For licensed crypto companies, it is much easier to open bank accounts, connect payment services, work with fiat currencies, and arrange insurance products. Banks collaborate much more willingly with companies whose activities are under regulatory supervision.

Better opportunities for attracting investments and scaling

The presence of a license is an important signal for investors and venture funds. It confirms that the company operates legally, openly, and in accordance with the requirements of regulators. This increases the chances of successfully attracting funding, conducting token sales, entering new markets, and international expansion.

In conclusion, a VASP license helps a company strengthen its reputation, scale its business, and confidently operate in the global crypto market. Although the process of obtaining it requires time and resources, in the long term, it creates a solid foundation for stable development, customer trust, and sustainable growth.

Who needs a VASP license?

A VASP license is mandatory for companies that, on behalf of their clients, carry out operations with virtual assets.

According to international standards, in particular FATF recommendations, the status of a virtual asset service provider is assigned to any company engaged in the exchange, custody, or transfer of digital assets. Such companies must obtain a license or undergo official registration in accordance with the requirements of a specific jurisdiction.

This category includes, in particular:

Cryptocurrency exchanges — platforms that carry out the exchange of cryptocurrencies for fiat money or vice versa, as well as provide trading between different crypto assets.
Crypto wallet providers — companies that provide custodial storage of digital assets, manage crypto wallets or private keys of users.
Platforms for ICOs and token sales — services that organize the attraction of investments through an initial token offering or other digital assets.
Crypto payment providers — companies that accept cryptocurrency payments, carry out international transfers, or convert cryptocurrency into fiat funds for businesses and third parties.
Crypto brokers and dealers — intermediaries that execute operations of buying, selling, or transferring digital assets on behalf of clients, in particular on the over-the-counter (OTC) market.

In some cases, licensing requirements may extend even to certain DeFi (decentralized finance) platforms. If a project has a centralized management element, receives commission income, or controls critical platform functions (for example, administrative keys or custodial storage), regulators may consider it a VASP. The very fact of using a DeFi model does not guarantee exemption from licensing requirements.

As regulation tightens, more and more countries apply sanctions to companies operating without a license. Such companies risk not only receiving fines or orders from regulators but also losing access to banking services, fiat payment tools, and cooperation with institutional investors.

Regardless of whether you launch a cryptocurrency exchange, expand activities in the field of DeFi, or create a product based on tokens, obtaining a VASP license is a necessary condition for legal work, scaling business, and long-term development.

Note. In some jurisdictions, different terminology is used. For example, in the European Union, within the framework of the MiCA regulation, the concept of CASP (Crypto-Asset Service Provider) is applied. Despite the difference in name, the requirement to obtain a corresponding license remains relevant. The difference between VASP and CASP is discussed in a separate section.

Licensing in Europe

Regulation of the cryptocurrency business in Europe has changed significantly over the last few years. It shifted from fragmented national rules to a unified framework for the entire EU.

In the past, crypto firms that operated within the European Union had to secure a Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) status or license separately in each country. These requirements emerged after the adoption of the Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD5). This directive obligated crypto exchanges and wallet providers to register with financial regulators and implement AML procedures.

However, each country implemented these rules in its own way. Requirements varied significantly, and this variation created an uneven regulatory environment. For example, during the early 2020s, businesses frequently chose Estonia or Lithuania because registration there was simpler and faster. Afterwards, they attempted to operate in other EU countries as well. Yet, this model failed to provide full access to the entire European market.

The Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, which took effect between 2023 and 2024, fundamentally changed the situation. It introduced uniform rules across all European Union member states and established a shared licensing framework for crypto enterprises.

Now, the Crypto-Asset Service Provider (CASP) status replaces the previous VASP concept within the EU. A company that obtains a CASP license in a single EU member state can legally provide services across the entire European Economic Area. There is no need to undergo separate procedures in every individual nation.

This move represents a major step forward for the European crypto market, as businesses gain clear rules and effectively a single internal market.

Let’s explore the core features of MiCA Regulation.

Uniform requirements across all countries

MiCA establishes identical standards for all crypto service providers, regardless of their country of registration. The mandates cover capital adequacy, corporate governance, internal control systems, information disclosure, and client protection.

Consequently, the differences between licenses in nations like Germany and Estonia decrease significantly. All licensed CASPs must satisfy the same baseline criteria. These include a minimum capital amount and effective risk management mechanisms.

The right to operate throughout the EU

One of the primary advantages of MiCA is passporting — a mechanism of mutual license recognition.

Once a firm receives approval from a single EU regulator (such as BaFin in Germany or the Bank of Lithuania), it can offer its services in all other bloc states without acquiring additional licenses.

In practice, this follows the principle of “one license — the entire European Union,” which substantially expands opportunities for scaling a business.

The transition period

Although MiCA officially took effect at the end of December 2024, lawmakers built in a transition period for firms already operating under national VASP frameworks.

Entities registered before December 30, 2024, may maintain operations under legacy rules until they secure a CASP license. The ultimate deadline is set for July 1, 2026, though certain nations might enforce earlier dates.

For this reason, most European crypto firms are navigating the shift from domestic registrations to the new unified regime throughout 2025 and 2026.

“The extension granted by Lithuania [until December 31, 2025] was a welcome development for the crypto industry. It provided valuable additional time for market participants to adapt to the upcoming regulatory framework, improve internal documentation and enhance technical infrastructure. This legislative development was a signal of a broader trend across Europe, especially in jurisdictions previously considered more favorable to the cryptocurrency sector,” comments Vlad Plakhotniuk, crypto lawyer at SBSB Fintech Lawyers.

Broadened market oversight

Legacy VASP frameworks targeted anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing rules, but MiCA expands oversight much further. The updated framework introduces several explicit components:

Capital reserves ranging from roughly 50,000 to 150,000 euros based on business type.
Detailed operational benchmarks.
Heightened risk management protocols.
Enhanced protections for consumers.

Thorough comprehension of MiCA mandates is vital for crypto firms planning a European launch in 2025 or 2026. These stricter rules grant access to the globe’s largest integrated market, where a single authorization permits instant operations across all EU members.

Choosing a European VASP License

After the implementation of MiCA, the key question for companies becomes not only obtaining a license, but also choosing the country in which to register it.

Although the requirements themselves are now identical for the entire EU, the speed of reviewing applications, administrative procedures, and the practical approach of regulators can significantly differ. That is exactly why the choice of jurisdiction directly affects the timeline of a company’s entry into the market and the convenience of further work.

Speed of the regulator’s work

Some European regulators traditionally review applications faster and have significant experience working with crypto companies.

Lithuania and Estonia have remained the most popular jurisdictions for several years already. Both countries actively developed the fintech sector and accumulated significant experience in licensing crypto businesses.

For instance, CASPs must deliver complete and transparent details about their products to users. They can also face liability for specific infractions, much like traditional financial institutions.r historically issued crypto registrations within a few months and, as expected, will maintain a fairly operational approach even after the transition to MiCA. That is exactly why many companies continue to consider Lithuania as one of the most attractive jurisdictions.

Estonia, although it significantly tightened requirements in recent years, also remains a modern digital jurisdiction with clear administrative procedures.

At the same time, in large countries such as Germany or France, the licensing process is usually more complex and takes more time.

Requirements for capital and real presence

MiCA establishes the minimum capital size depending on the type of crypto services. For example, for operators of trading platforms, which are under Class 3 CASPs, the minimum initial capital requirement is 150,000 euros.

However, individual states can put forward additional requirements regarding the so-called economic substance — the real presence of the business.

This can mean the necessity of:

opening an office;
appointing local directors;
forming a management team inside the country.

For example, in Ireland, to register a VASP, it is necessary to create a local legal entity and provide local management. Other countries may treat the use of outsourced or part-time specialists more flexibly.

Therefore, even before choosing a jurisdiction, it is worth evaluating how ready the company is to invest in a physical presence on the spot.

Experience and professional environment

An equally important factor is the local ecosystem.

Countries with a developed fintech market and a large number of professional consultants significantly facilitate passing the licensing process.

For example:

Germany and Ireland have a strong financial sector and a high level of expertise in the field of compliance;
Lithuania and Estonia have formed powerful fintech clusters with a significant number of crypto companies, legal advisors, and specialized services.

The presence of experienced consultants, auditors, and potential partners often accelerates the entire process of obtaining a license.

Language and administrative expenses

A practical but important aspect is also the working language of the regulator.

In some countries, most documents can be submitted in English, while in others, official translations will be needed, which increases expenses and processing timelines.

In addition, state fees also differ. In some jurisdictions, they remain moderate, while in others, it is necessary to take into account additional expenses for notary services, legalization of documents, or local representatives.

Which countries are considered the best today?

According to industry experts, among the most attractive jurisdictions for obtaining a CASP license in 2025 are Lithuania, Estonia, and Slovakia.

Lithuania and Estonia offer clear rules, a predictable regulatory environment, and a relatively fast licensing process. Especially often, businesses choose Lithuania thanks to the opportunity to get access to the whole European market in relatively short timelines — approximately 3–6 months, provided that the applicant has a properly prepared application and satisfies the regulator’s requirements.

Slovakia also gradually strengthens its position as a promising jurisdiction thanks to transparent rules and a constructive approach of the regulator.

On the other hand, Germany and France remain prestigious and authoritative options; however, they usually suit large international companies better, ready for long procedures, more detailed oversight, and higher expenses for maintaining the license.

Comparison of VASP and CASP Licenses

The terms VASP (Virtual Asset Service Provider) and CASP (Crypto-Asset Service Provider) are often used interchangeably, especially when it comes to the regulation of crypto business in the European Union. In reality, CASP is a modern European version of the VASP license, introduced by the MiCA regulation. Although both licenses relate to activities with virtual assets, there are several important differences between them.

Scope of regulation

The traditional VASP license, which operated in many countries until 2025, was focused mainly on anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CFT) requirements. Companies were required to verify clients (KYC), monitor transactions, and report suspicious operations.

The CASP license, provided for by the MiCA regulation, includes all these requirements but significantly expands them. It establishes additional rules regarding the financial stability of the company, internal governance, and client protection.

For example, MiCA obligates CASP companies to maintain a minimum capital in the amount of 50,000 to 150,000 euros (depending on the type of activity), as well as to ensure transparent informing of clients about risks.

In other words, CASP is a VASP with broader and stricter requirements that regulate not only the fight against money laundering but also how the company organizes its work and interacts with clients.

Territory of validity of the license

Historically, the VASP license was issued by an individual state and was valid only within its borders. If a company wanted to operate in several countries, it usually had to undergo licensing or registration in each of them separately.

The CASP license works on a different principle. After receiving permission from the regulator of any EU member state, the company is entered into the ESMA register and receives the right to provide its services across the entire territory of the European Union thanks to the passporting mechanism.

This is one of the key advantages of MiCA: instead of dozens of separate national licenses, it is enough to obtain one.

Uniform rules of regulation

Before the appearance of MiCA, requirements for VASPs differed significantly depending on the country. In one jurisdiction there could be minimal requirements for capital and a fast procedure for obtaining permission, while in another, significant financial requirements and a long approval process.

MiCA eliminates this problem. All EU countries operate under a single set of rules and standards, so the procedure for obtaining a CASP license has become much more predictable. Although individual administrative details may differ, the general requirements are identical for the entire European Union.

Outside the EU, the situation remains different; VASP licensing regimes continue to differ significantly depending on the country.

Transition from VASP to CASP

Companies that already had a national registration or VASP license in EU countries do not receive CASP status automatically.

To continue activity in accordance with the new rules, they must submit a separate application for obtaining a CASP license within the established transition period (for most countries, until mid-2025) and undergo the full authorization procedure.

While the review of the application is ongoing, the company can operate under the old registration in its country until the moment a decision is made or until the completion of the transition period, which ends on July 1, 2026.

In fact, this means that all European VASPs must either switch to the CASP regime or cease activity after the completion of the transition period.

How about discussing the VASP License with our experts?

Send Request

Comparative Table of VASP Jurisdictions

Cryptocurrency companies can obtain a license in different countries of the world, and each jurisdiction has its own requirements, application processing times, and advantages.

Below is a comparative table of the most popular jurisdictions as of 2025.

Jurisdiction	Minimum Capital	Approval Timeframe	Key Advantages
Lithuania (EU)	From 50,000-150,000	3–6 months	Access to the entire EU market via MiCA (passporting), reliable European regulation.
Georgia	None	5–6 months	Absence of requirements for minimum capital, fast licensing, low tax burden, promising crypto hub.
Seychelles	None	10–12 months	Popular offshore jurisdiction, simple licensing requirements, possibility of token issuance.
El Salvador	$2,000 (5% paid-in)	6–7 months	Friendly attitude towards cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin has the status of legal tender), low costs, and state support.
Singapore	$100,000 ($73k USD)	10–12 months	One of the leading global financial centers, strong regulatory reputation and convenient exit to the Asian market.
United Kingdom	Custom (registration required)	12–13 months	Global financial center with a high level of trust in the regulator; AML registration is carried out through the FCA.
United States	Varies (state-by-state)	Varies (complex)	The largest crypto market in the world, but one of the most complex licensing regimes: federal registration with FinCEN and separate permissions in each state are required.
United Arab Emirates	Varies (activity-based)	7–9 months	One of the most dynamic crypto centers in the world (Dubai VARA, Abu Dhabi FSRA), favorable regulatory environment and growing support from banks.
British Virgin Islands	None	7-8 months	Flexible offshore regulation, fast company registration and profitable tax regime (without direct access to the EU market).

Best Jurisdictions in the World for Obtaining a VASP License

The choice of the best jurisdiction for obtaining a crypto license depends on your business goals. For some companies, reputation and market trust are key; for others, the speed of registration, cost, or the ability to operate in a specific region. Below are the jurisdictions that, as of 2025–2026, are considered among the best for obtaining a VASP license, each with its own advantages.

European Union (Lithuania, Estonia, and other countries)

If your company targets the European market, a CASP license within the EU is one of the strongest options thanks to the principle of “passporting.” This means that after obtaining a license in one country, you can legally operate in all EU states.

Lithuania and Estonia remain popular entry points: they offer a relatively fast licensing process, have significant experience working with crypto companies, and already fully comply with the requirements of the MiCA regulation. Choosing a European jurisdiction, a business receives not only a high level of trust, but also access to one of the largest markets in the world within a single legal field.

Great Britain

In Great Britain, crypto companies must undergo mandatory registration with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in accordance with the requirements of anti-money laundering (AML) legislation. Formally, this is not a license; however, without this registration, it is impossible to conduct activity.

The process is considered one of the most demanding: historically, the FCA approved only a portion of applications. At the same time, successful registration is a significant confirmation of a high level of compliance with regulatory requirements. Thanks to London’s status as one of the world’s leading financial centers, British registration significantly increases the trust of banks, institutional investors, and large partners. This is especially relevant for companies planning to work with traditional financial institutions or provide institutional crypto services.

Singapore

In Singapore, licenses for digital payment token (DPT) service providers are issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) in accordance with the Payment Services Act.

Obtaining permission is not easy: the number of issued licenses so far remains limited, and the process is thorough and competitive. However, that is precisely why a Singaporean license is highly valued on the international market. It opens access to the Asia-Pacific region and testifies to compliance with some of the highest standards of compliance, which positively affects cooperation with banks and investors.

The minimum capital size depends on the type of license and ranges from 100,000 to 250,000 Singapore dollars, and the review of an application usually lasts more than six months.

United Arab Emirates (Dubai and Abu Dhabi)

The UAE in recent years has become one of the most dynamic world centers for crypto business.

In Dubai, regulation is carried out by the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), and in the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) — by the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA). They offer clear rules for exchanges, custodial services, brokers, and other crypto market participants.

The approach of regulators is oriented toward business development: the rules are transparent, and the licensing mechanism provides for step-by-step approval — first a preliminary approval, and then a full-fledged license. Although capital requirements depend on the type of activity, the UAE remains a very attractive jurisdiction due to a favorable tax regime, in particular the absence of corporate tax in certain economic zones, and active state support for the crypto industry.

Switzerland

Switzerland has long been considered one of the pioneers in the field of crypto finance. There is no separate VASP license here. Cryptocurrency activity is regulated through already existing financial licenses, in particular the FinTech license, licenses for financial institutions, or participation in self-regulatory organizations (SROs) that exercise AML oversight.

Obtaining permission is associated with high capital and compliance requirements, and for certain areas of activity, even a banking license may be required. At the same time, Swiss regulation provides an exceptional level of trust. The regulator FINMA has significant experience working with crypto projects, and the Zug region, known as Crypto Valley, has become home to hundreds of blockchain companies. Switzerland is especially suitable for businesses working with institutional investors, wealth management, or complex financial products, such as cryptocurrency ETFs.

Offshore Jurisdictions (British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Seychelles, Panama, and others)

For startups for which launch speed, flexibility, and low costs are important, offshore jurisdictions remain a popular choice.

For example, in the British Virgin Islands, crypto companies can operate within flexible financial legislation. Company registration takes little time, requirements for authorized capital are minimal (sometimes a symbolic contribution is enough), and subsequent regulatory obligations are significantly simpler than in most major financial centers.

Similar conditions are also offered by the Seychelles and Panama: fast registration, small state fees, and a favorable tax system. Such jurisdictions are especially suitable for holding structures, token issuers, or crypto exchanges that almost do not work with fiat currencies. At the same time, it is worth considering that banks and large international partners may pay more attention to such companies during verification.

El Salvador

After El Salvador became the first country to recognize Bitcoin as legal tender, it is actively developing legislation for crypto businesses.

The National Commission for Digital Assets issues Digital Asset Service Provider licenses with fairly accessible conditions: the minimum capital is only 2,000 US dollars, and it is sufficient to deposit only 5% of this amount. The approval procedure usually lasts about one month.

An additional advantage is tax incentives: profit from operations with Bitcoin is not taxed with capital gains tax, and for foreign crypto investors, a number of tax breaks are provided. That is precisely why El Salvador is especially interesting to companies building a business around Bitcoin or operating in the Latin American market.

Which jurisdiction to choose?

Each of the listed jurisdictions has its strengths and limitations. A universal solution does not exist: the optimal choice depends on the business model, target clients, geography of activity, and what is more important to you (international reputation, speed of obtaining a license, or minimal VASP license prices).

Many companies use a combined strategy. For example, they obtain a license in the European Union for access to the European market, and in parallel create a separate structure in an offshore jurisdiction for token issuance or conducting research and technological developments.

In any case, in 2025–2026, the choice of jurisdictions for VASP licensing is wider than ever before. With a correctly chosen strategy and professional support, a crypto business can find a country that will best match its goals and development plans.

Regulatory Requirements for Companies to Obtain a VASP License

To obtain a VASP license, companies must submit documentation alongside fulfilling a complex set of legal, operational, and compliance obligations. Authorities want to verify that virtual asset businesses operate transparently, safely, and in line with international financial security standards. Even though specific mandates vary by jurisdiction, most countries establish several foundational conditions.

Registered legal entity

The company must be officially registered in the jurisdiction where obtaining the license is planned. In many cases, it is specifically about a local legal entity, a company created in accordance with the legislation of this country. To the application are usually attached documents about registration and confirmation of proper legal status (good standing). Some states also require the presence of a physical office or a local representative to confirm the real presence of the business. For example, the MiCA regulation in the EU provides that a crypto-asset service provider (CASP) must have an office on the territory of one of the EU member states.

Reliable and qualified management

Regulators thoroughly check owners, directors, and key officers of the company. Usually, it is necessary to provide detailed resumes, certificates of no criminal record, and letters of recommendation.

Special attention is paid to such positions as Compliance Officer and MLRO (money laundering reporting officer). Candidates must have relevant professional experience, an impeccable business reputation, and, in certain jurisdictions, pass a check for compliance with requirements (fit and proper test) or even an interview with the regulator. Often, financial or legal expertise is also required, and sometimes permanent residence in the country of licensing.

AML/CFT Policies

One of the key conditions for obtaining a license is an effective system of anti-money laundering (AML) and countering the financing of terrorism (CFT).

The company must documentally describe internal procedures regarding:

identification and verification of customers (KYC);
risk assessment of customers;
continuous monitoring of transactions;
detection and reporting of suspicious operations.

The package of documents usually includes a comprehensive AML policy, which explains how the company will comply with national legislation and FATF requirements, in particular the so-called Travel Rule — the rule of transferring information about the sender and recipient of cryptocurrency transfers. Regulators also can ask to provide templates of customer risk assessment, a description of transaction monitoring systems, and a staff training program in the field of compliance.

Minimum capital and financial stability

In most jurisdictions, the company must confirm a sufficient level of its own capital or financial resources. This is needed so that the business can operate stably, cover operational expenses, and fulfill its obligations to customers.

For example, according to MiCA, the minimum size of own capital in the EU ranges from 50,000 to over 150,000 euros depending on the list of services that the company provides.

Detailed business plan and internal documentation

During the submission of the application, it is necessary to prepare a thorough business plan, which describes:

the list of services with virtual assets;
the target audience;
the business model and sources of income;
the operational activity of the company.

It is also necessary to explain whether the company will work with fiat currencies, how the safekeeping of client assets will be carried out, which blockchain technologies will be used, and other key aspects of work.

Besides the business plan, it is usually necessary to develop a series of internal documents, among which:

risk management policy;
information security policy;
rules of internal control;
personal data protection policy (in particular in accordance with GDPR, if it applies);
in some cases — a plan of internal or external audit.

Such documents demonstrate that the company evaluated possible risks in advance and implemented mechanisms of their control.

IT security and cyber protection

Since the activity of a VASP is entirely based on digital infrastructure, a high level of cybersecurity is a mandatory requirement.

The company must confirm that it uses reliable IT systems for data protection, prevention of cyberattacks, and response to incidents. Regulators rarely require an information security policy or the results of an independent IT audit.

In EU countries, compliance with the requirements of the DORA regulation (Digital Operational Resilience Act), which establishes standards of digital operational resilience for the financial sector, may also be expected.

The applicant must describe:

how personal data of customers are protected;
how cryptographic keys are stored (encryption, multi-signature, cold storage, etc.);
what measures are provided to ensure business continuity in case of a cyberattack or technical failure.

Compliance with FATF Travel Rule

One of the components of AML requirements is the fulfillment of the Travel Rule, recommended by FATF.

Like banks during international transfers, VASPs must ensure the transfer of necessary information about the sender and recipient of cryptocurrency transactions if the amount of the operation exceeds the established threshold.

During the consideration of the application, the regulator may inquire in what exact way the company plans to fulfill these requirements. For example, whether it will use a specialized Travel Rule protocol or a third-party technology provider. This testifies to compliance with international standards for combating financial crimes.

Appointment of responsible officers

During licensing, it is necessary to officially determine the persons responsible for key directions of the company’s activity. In particular, these can be:

compliance Officer or MLRO;
general director (CEO);
directors or other managers responsible for operational activity.

Such persons often sign personal declarations by which they confirm that they understand their legal duties. In some countries, it is also required that the compliance officer or at least one director permanently resides in the country of licensing.

Local presence

In many jurisdictions, the company must have an official address or a physical office through which interaction with the regulator is carried out.

Certain countries additionally require that at least one director be a resident or citizen of the country, and also that the company has local employees.

The level of such requirements differs depending on the jurisdiction. For example, the Central Bank of Ireland expects from a VASP a real operational presence and local management, whereas certain offshore jurisdictions allow working remotely under the condition of having only a registered local agent.

VASP license registration process

Obtaining a VASP license is a multi-stage process that requires careful preparation of documents. Although specific requirements depend on the jurisdiction, in most countries the procedure follows a similar scenario. Its purpose is to ensure that the company is ready to operate in accordance with the legislation and fulfills all regulatory requirements.

Below, we will consider the main stages of VASP license registration — from choosing a country to fulfilling the requirements after obtaining the permit.

Choosing a Jurisdiction

The first and one of the most important steps is to decide in which country to obtain the license. It is this decision that will affect all subsequent stages: requirements for the company, timelines for reviewing the application, expenses, and opportunities for entering markets.

During the choice, it is worth considering:

regulatory environment;
access to target markets;
duration of the licensing procedure;
VASP license price for obtaining and maintaining;
features of your business model.

For example, if you plan to work with clients in the EU, a logical choice would be obtaining a CASP license in one of the European Union countries. If, on the other hand, the main goal is to quickly launch a highly specialized service, an offshore jurisdiction may be expedient.

Before the final decision, it is worth carefully studying the requirements of each country. It is also useful to turn to lawyers who specialize in cryptocurrency regulation in the chosen region. They will help to take into account not only formal rules, but also practical nuances and typical mistakes of applicants.

It is important to remember that some jurisdictions have a strong international reputation, which simplifies the opening of bank accounts and increases investor trust. Others may offer a faster licensing process, but at the same time will have less international recognition. Therefore, choose a country that will correspond not only to your current launch plans, but also to your long-term development strategy.

Preparation of the Necessary Documents

After choosing a jurisdiction and registering a local legal entity, the largest stage begins — the preparation of documents. It is this stage that usually takes the most time.

Here’s what the standard package of documents includes.

Business plan and application

It is necessary to prepare a detailed business plan, which describes:

the list of the company’s services;
target audience;
revenue generation model;
approach to risk management.

Also, it is necessary to fill out official forms provided by the regulator.

Internal policies

Regulators require a set of internal documents, among which are:

AML/CFT policy;
KYC procedures;
risk assessment policy;
information security policy;
other internal regulations in accordance with local legislation.

These documents should not be templates — they must be adapted to the requirements of a specific country. For example, if the legislation provides for enhanced verification of large transactions, this must be directly prescribed in the AML policy.

Corporate documents

Usually, it is required to provide:

certificate of company registration;
statutory documents;
register of directors and shareholders;
documents confirming the ownership structure;
scheme of the corporate group (if there are parent or related companies).

This allows the regulator to understand who actually controls the business.

Information about owners and management

For all ultimate beneficial owners, directors, and key officers, it is usually necessary to prepare:

passport or another document proving identity;
confirmation of residential address;
resume;
diplomas or professional certificates (if needed);
certificate of no criminal record.

In many countries, documents issued abroad must be notarized or formalized with an apostille. Since obtaining such documents can take several weeks, it is worth starting this process in advance.

Financial information

If the company is only being created, the regulator may require a financial forecast for the next one to three years, indicating:

expected revenues;
expenses;
capital level.

If the legal entity already exists, an initial balance sheet or confirmation of the presence of authorized capital, for example, bank statements, may be required.

Data on the auditor and banking services

In some jurisdictions, it is necessary to report:

which audit company will accompany the business;
in which bank a corporate account is opened or planned to be opened.

Such documents confirm that the company has the necessary infrastructure for legal and safe operation.

The quality of document preparation is of decisive importance. It is precisely an incomplete package or inaccuracies that most often cause delays or refusals in issuing a license. Before submitting an application, it is worth once again checking all the regulator’s requirements and making sure that the documents are structured and formatted properly. A practical solution would be to add a table of contents or a covering letter with a list of documents and an explanation of exactly which regulatory requirements they confirm.

Want to explore the VASP License?

Send Request

Implementation of AML/KYC Measures

Even before submitting the application, the company must not only develop AML and KYC policies, but also be ready to apply them in practice.

Modern regulators want to see that the business already has working mechanisms for combating money laundering and terrorist financing, and does not just formally describe them in documents.

Customer verification system (KYC)

It is necessary to determine exactly how the company will verify customers:

with the help of specialized verification services;
through manual verification of documents;
or using a combined approach.

In the application, it is necessary to describe the entire identification process. Some regulators may ask to demonstrate the customer’s path during registration or provide a detailed description of the procedure.

Transaction monitoring

The company must determine which tools it will use to detect suspicious operations.

Many cryptocurrency companies apply specialized AML platforms and solutions for blockchain analysis, which automatically detect risky transactions (for example, operations related to mixers or addresses from sanction lists).

The presence of such software or a concluded contract with its supplier demonstrates a serious approach to fulfilling the requirements of the legislation.

Personnel training

The person responsible for compliance and other employees must understand their AML duties well.

The regulator may ask to confirm:

the team’s experience;
passing specialized training;
the presence of internal training or certificates.

In some countries, it is also necessary to conduct an AML risk assessment of the business model even before obtaining the license.

Practical application of procedures

It is important not only to write policies, but also to be ready to show how they work in real life.

For example, the company must be able to demonstrate:

how the registration of a new customer goes;
where and how their personal data is stored;
in what way the system detects suspicious operations;
how a message to the competent authorities is formed.

It is useful to conduct internal testing of all procedures even before submitting the application — create a conventional customer, go through the full KYC process, assess risks, and check whether all actions meet the requirements of the legislation.

During the review of the application, the regulator may ask additional questions or conduct an interview regarding the work of the AML system. If the company has already implemented the necessary mechanisms or is fully ready to launch them immediately after obtaining the license, this significantly increases the chances of successful passage of licensing. Regulators pay special attention to AML issues; therefore, the practical readiness of the company is an important competitive advantage.

Submission of application

When all documents are ready and the internal processes of the company are established, the next stage comes — the official submission of an application for obtaining a license to the relevant regulator. Usually, this process includes several steps.

Filing the application

The company sends a full package of documents, which can consist of both electronic forms and paper documents. In some countries, regulators already use online portals for submitting applications for a VASP/CASP license. For example, in EU countries within the framework of MiCA regulation, electronic submission systems are provided. In other jurisdictions, documents need to be sent by mail or submitted in person.

Payment of fees

Along with the submission of the application, it is usually necessary to pay a state fee for its review or the issuance of the license. Its size depends on the country and can range from several hundred to several thousand euros (or the equivalent in local currency). It is important to correctly pay the set amount and save the confirmation of payment — it may be required as part of the document package.

Confirmation of receipt of the application

In most jurisdictions, the regulator officially confirms the receipt of documents. For example, according to MiCA, the regulator must confirm receipt of the CASP application within five working days. This confirmation is important because it is from this moment that the official period for reviewing the application usually begins.

Initial check of completeness

At this stage, the regulator checks whether the application contains all necessary documents and information. The legislation of some countries establishes a separate period for this, for example, one month. If something is missing or certain data require clarification, a request for additional information is sent to the applicant. It is worth responding to such requests quickly and as fully as possible, because it is at this stage that delays most often occur.

Regulatory review

After the application is recognized as complete, its substantive analysis begins. Various departments of the regulator can be involved in the check: AML specialists evaluate anti-money laundering policies, lawyers check corporate documents, and financial experts analyze capital adequacy and financial stability of the company. In the process of review, the regulator may ask additional questions or ask for explanations. For example, they may ask to describe in detail the token listing procedure or the architecture of cybersecurity systems. Such requests should be treated with maximum responsibility, providing comprehensive answers and supporting materials within the established deadlines.

Interviews and meetings

Some regulators conduct meetings or interviews with company executives within the licensing process. For example, directors or the compliance officer may be invited to an in-person meeting or video conference to discuss the application and evaluate their understanding of regulatory requirements. For the regulator, this is an opportunity to make sure that the business is managed by competent specialists who are aware of their duties and ready to perform them.

Decision on issuing a license

After the completion of the check, the regulator makes a decision. If the application is approved, the company receives a license or confirmation of registration, and its data can be entered into the official register of licensed VASPs. If the issuance of the license is denied or it is granted with certain conditions, the regulator is obliged to explain the reasons for such a decision.

In practice, review periods can differ significantly. In jurisdictions with simplified procedures, a decision is sometimes made in about a month, whereas in countries with a more thorough check, the process can last from three to six months and longer. The MiCA regulation establishes more unified periods: after the application is recognized as complete, the regulator, as a rule, must make a decision within 40 working days, although this period may be extended if additional information is needed.

Ongoing compliance and reporting

Receiving a license is an important stage of company development, but by no means the end of the process. After licensing, a continuous stage of regulatory compliance begins, which lasts throughout the entire time of the business’s operation.

Regular reporting

Licensed crypto service providers usually must regularly report to the regulator. These can be annual financial statements, audit conclusions, as well as reports on the fulfillment of AML requirements. In some countries, it is also necessary to submit quarterly or semi-annual data on transaction volumes, the number of clients, and other performance indicators. For example, in a number of EU countries, crypto companies submit reporting by analogy with other financial institutions, including the annual report of the compliance officer regarding AML/CFT.

Continuous execution of AML/KYC requirements

After receiving a license, the company must carry out the identification and verification of new clients (KYC), monitor transactions for suspicious activity, and, if necessary, submit suspicious transaction reports (STR) to the financial intelligence unit. In many jurisdictions, a regular check of clients against sanctions lists is also mandatory. The compliance program must be constantly maintained in an up-to-date state, because the regulator has the right to conduct checks and demand confirmation of its proper functioning at any moment.

Maintaining sufficient capital and financial stability

The company must continuously maintain the minimum level of capital established by law. If, due to market changes or financial losses, capital drops below the regulatory level, it must be replenished promptly. Some licensing regimes, in particular certain European ones, also provide for constant compliance with requirements regarding capital adequacy or the presence of a financial reserve. If the company stores clients’ assets, it must constantly provide their full coverage and proper segregated storage.

Notification of significant changes

Regulators must be informed in a timely manner about any important changes in the company’s activity. This applies to the change of directors or management, ownership structure, legal address, launch of new products or services, as well as information security incidents. In some cases, such changes require prior approval of the regulator. For example, a change of control over the company may be possible only after verification and approval of the new owners.

Audits and license renewals

In some countries, VASP licenses are issued for a fixed term and require renewal, although in many jurisdictions they are indefinite provided that all requirements are met. An independent financial audit is often mandatory every year, and its results must be submitted to the regulator. In addition, regulators can conduct planned checks or on-site inspections, especially during the first years after the issuance of the license. Therefore, the company must constantly maintain proper order in the documentation: store transaction history, KYC dossiers of clients, minutes of meetings of governing bodies, and other internal documents.

Relevance of internal procedures

Regulation of the cryptocurrency sphere is actively developing, so requirements can regularly change. This applies both to updates of FATF recommendations and to new technical standards of MiCA or other regulatory acts. A licensed company must constantly follow changes in legislation and adapt its internal policies and procedures promptly. This may involve additional staff training, updating compliance tools, or strengthening cybersecurity measures in accordance with new standards.

Constant compliance with regulatory requirements is sometimes perceived as an additional administrative burden. However, it is precisely what provides customer trust, business stability, and the right of the company to continue working in the market. Practice shows that companies that integrate compliance into corporate culture fulfill these requirements much more easily than those who view them only as a formal duty.

At the same time, for the regulator, the issuance of a license is only the beginning of supervisory relations with the company. In many countries, licensees pay supervisory or license fees every year, and also regularly interact with the regulator, in particular through meetings with the compliance officer or submission of additional information. Constructive and open cooperation with the regulator after receiving the license helps to avoid unnecessary risks, promptly resolve possible issues, and provide stable business operations.

VASP license price and investment structure

Obtaining a VASP crypto license is not only the payment of a state fee. The total VASP license price depends on the country, regulatory requirements, and the specifics of your business. In different jurisdictions, VASP license costs can differ significantly, so instead of a fixed amount, it is worth focusing on several key cost categories.

Initial VASP license cost: registration, lawyers, and document preparation

At the start, it is necessary to budget for:

State fees for application submission or registration.
Legal support and consultations.
Preparation of the document package.
Notarization and translations.
Specialized opinions or audits (for example, an IT audit or a legal opinion of a local firm, if required by the regulator).

In jurisdictions with a simplified licensing procedure, starting costs can amount to around 15,000–20,000 euros. Usually, this is enough for basic registration and legal support.

If it comes to countries with stricter regulation, VASP license prices can rise to 50,000–100,000 euros and more. For example, obtaining a full CASP license in the EU often costs more than 50,000 euros, and if a company plans to be licensed simultaneously, say, in Europe and the USA, the budget will be even higher.

Practice shows that during preparation, additional VASP license costs often arise, such as new document requirements, extra translations, or consultations. Therefore, it is worth anticipating a financial reserve immediately.

Share capital: funds that need to be confirmed

In addition to administrative expenses, most regulators require confirming the presence of a minimum paid-up share capital. This demonstrates the financial stability of the company and its readiness to operate in a regulated market.

The size of such requirements depends on the jurisdiction:

In certain offshore countries, minimum capital is practically absent (for example, a symbolic 1 dollar or 0 euros at all).
In the European Union, under MiCA rules, the minimum own capital usually amounts to 50,000, 125,000, or 150,000 euros depending on the type of services, and for certain areas (for example, working with stablecoins) it can be even higher.
In South Africa, there is no fixed amount, but the company must prove the adequacy of its financial resources;
In El Salvador, the minimum requirement is 2,000 USD.
In Hong Kong, for crypto exchanges — 5 million Hong Kong dollars (approximately 600,000 euros).

Usually, this capital must be deposited into an account in a local bank before or during application submission, and documentary proof must be provided to the regulator.

It is important to understand that these funds, as a rule, are not intended for operational activity. They serve the role of a financial reserve and must remain in the company as a guarantee of its stability.

This is exactly why, even at the planning stage, it is worth determining the source of funding, which is founders’ own funds, attracted investments, or other capital.

Ongoing costs after obtaining the license

Obtaining a license is only the beginning. Moving forward, the company must regularly confirm compliance with regulatory requirements, and this means continuous operational costs.

Regulatory payments and license renewal

Many regulators charge annual fees for supervision or license renewal. Their size can be fixed or depend on the scale of the business — from a few thousand to tens of thousands of euros per year.

Compliance specialists

In most countries, a company must have a person responsible for compliance and AML/CTF control (Compliance Officer or MLRO), and sometimes a whole team.

Especially in Europe or North America, this is one of the largest cost items: the salary of an experienced specialist can be 70,000–100,000 euros per year and more.

Audit and regular reporting

Regulators often require:

Annual financial audit.
Verification of internal control systems.
Regular submission of reports.

In addition to this, as the company grows, expenses increase for software for transaction monitoring, blockchain analytics, and risk control.

Office and local presence

If the legislation requires physical presence in the licensing country, it is necessary to consider costs for:

Office rent.
Payment of utilities.
Remuneration to local directors.
Services of corporate providers if their addresses or nominee directors are used.

Technology and cybersecurity

Regulated crypto-business requires constant investments in security:

Regular penetration testing.
Information security certification (for example, ISO 27001).
Modernization of IT infrastructure.
Implementation of modern KYC solutions.
Integration of services to fulfill Travel Rule requirements.

As the business develops, these expenses also grow.

Unforeseen VASP license costs

It is advisable to provide a reserve budget in case of:

Changes in legislation and the need to obtain additional legal opinions.
Arrangement of mandatory insurance or financial guarantees (if required by the regulator).
Business trips for meetings with regulators or resolving corporate issues in the licensing country.

The VASP license cost is significantly more than the state fee for its issuance. In reality, it is a combination of three large components:

Initial costs for preparation and processing.
Funds that need to be reserved as share capital.
Ongoing costs for maintaining compliance with regulatory requirements.

According to market estimates, launching a company and obtaining a license in the EU in 2025 may require over 150,000 euros already during the first year, if taking into account capital, legal support, and all associated costs. At the same time, individual offshore jurisdictions allow fitting within less than 50,000 euros.

Therefore, VASP licensing should be treated the same as launching any financial institution: it is necessary to have a sufficient stock of funds not only to obtain the license but also for stable operation after its issuance.

For the regulator, the presence of a realistic budget and sufficient capitalization is additional proof that the company is ready to work transparently and fulfill all its obligations. And for banks, partners, and clients, this is a signal that the business is set up for long-term activity and meets high standards of the regulated financial market.

Common mistakes and challenges in the VASP licensing process

The process of obtaining a VASP crypto license is rarely simple. Crypto companies often face the same mistakes that drag out the review of the application or even lead to a refusal. If you know about them in advance, you can avoid unnecessary expenses of time, money, and nerves.

Incomplete or poorly prepared package of documents

The most common mistake is to underestimate how detailed you need to prepare documents. If the application lacks information, separate documents are missing, or there are contradictions between different sections, the regulator will almost certainly ask you to provide explanations or corrections. Because of this, the process can drag out for several weeks or even months.

Advice: before submitting, carefully check whether all requirements are fulfilled, and if possible, ask an independent expert to review the package of documents. A well-structured and complete application significantly increases the chances of passing the check without unnecessary delays.

Incorrectly chosen jurisdiction

Some companies submit an application without fully understanding the requirements of a specific country. Already during the review, it may turn out that they cannot fulfill a key condition (for example, appoint a local director, confirm the required statutory capital, or adapt the business model to local legislation). As a result, they have to withdraw the application or receive a refusal.

Constantly changing jurisdictions in search of the “simplest” option is also not the best strategy. If regulators see that the company has already unsuccessfully tried to obtain a license in another country, this can cause additional questions.

Advice: thoroughly analyze available jurisdictions even before starting the procedure and choose the one that truly corresponds to your business model and resources.

Underestimation of costs and deadlines

Another common mistake is to expect that a license can be obtained quickly and cheaply. Because of this, startups sometimes exhaust their budget even before the completion of the check or do not have funds for the implementation of necessary compliance systems when the regulator requires it.

No less risky is planning a business launch without taking into account real licensing deadlines.

In practice, even in jurisdictions with an accelerated procedure, the process usually takes at least several months, and in major financial centers — six months or more.

Advice: lay in funding not only for the entire process of obtaining a license, but also for possible delays. Also take into account that compliance costs do not end after the license is issued — they become a permanent part of the company’s activity.

Insufficient internal expertise

Regulators carefully evaluate the competence of the team. If during the check it becomes obvious that employees insufficiently understand compliance requirements or the specifics of the cryptocurrency business, this can negatively affect the decision regarding the license.

That is precisely why an experienced Compliance Officer must be involved even before submitting the application. In most jurisdictions, he needs to be indicated in the documents, and the regulator separately evaluates his qualifications.

Also, directors and founders must navigate well both in the company’s business model and in regulatory requirements.

Advice: if your team lacks experience working in the field of financial regulation, it is worth involving a consultant or legal advisor who will help prepare for the check and, if necessary, will participate in communication with the regulator.

Using template documents without adaptation

Another common problem is using typical policies or documents prepared for another country without adaptation to local legislation.

For example, an AML policy that does not take into account the requirements of a specific jurisdiction will almost certainly require refinement or even full rewriting. The reason is simple: rules of financial monitoring differ depending on the country — threshold amounts of checks, risk assessment criteria, and other requirements can change.

Advice: adapt each document to the legislation of the country where you receive the license. It is best if the final check is conducted by a local legal advisor.

Poor quality communication with the regulator

Even a correctly prepared application can face delays due to improper communication with the regulator.

Untimely responses, incomplete information, or unwillingness to constructively respond to requests only complicate the process. If the regulator sends a request with several questions, it is important to answer each of them and add all necessary supporting documents.

Advice: answer quickly, openly, and as fully as possible. If a language barrier can become a problem, it is worth involving a translator or a local representative.

Weakening of compliance after obtaining the license

Obtaining a license is not the completion of work, but only the beginning of constant regulatory oversight.

After approval of the application, some companies reduce attention to compliance: postpone the hiring of new specialists, do not update the AML risk assessment, or implement new internal procedures is untimely.

This can cost dearly. In many countries, new licensees are under especially close control, and serious violations already in the first years of activity can lead to fines or even revocation of the license.

Compliance is a continuous process that requires regular attention, resources, and systemic work.

Individual features of each jurisdiction

Besides general difficulties, each country has its own characteristics. Somewhere, the process can slow down due to bureaucratic procedures, slow company registration, or difficulties with opening a corporate bank account. Such factors do not always depend on the licensing body, but they also affect the general deadlines for launching a business.

Therefore, during preparation for licensing, it is important to stock up not only with a sufficient budget, but also with patience. Exact consistency, attention to detail, and readiness to work with the regulator usually become the guarantee of successfully obtaining a VASP crypto license.

Need more information about the VASP License?

Send Request

How to quickly obtain a VASP license in any jurisdiction

Although the concept of “quickly” in the sphere of licensing is quite conditional (after all, even in the most rapid jurisdictions the procedure lasts at least a few weeks), there are ways to significantly speed up this process. The main thing is to thoroughly prepare and competently build interaction with the regulator.

Analysis of the regulatory framework

A quick path to a license begins with a deep understanding of the requirements of the legislation. Before submitting an application, carefully study the regulatory framework of the chosen jurisdiction: laws, official recommendations of the regulator, as well as recent decisions or typical reasons for rejections.

The better you understand what exactly the regulator expects, the easier it is to prepare an application without common mistakes.

Get acquainted with official recommendations

Many regulators publish step-by-step instructions, checklists, or methodological materials for applicants. Be sure to find these documents and carefully work through them.

For example, if there is a manual on submitting an application for a VASP license or a list of the most common mistakes, perceive it as a practical guide. Such materials help you immediately take into account the expectations of the regulator and avoid unnecessary revisions.

Study the experience of other companies

If possible, analyze the cases of companies that have already received a license, or those that were refused. Useful information can be found in industry media, press releases, or obtained from consultants who accompanied similar projects.

In many countries, regulators also publish registers of licensed companies. If you see that dozens of VASPs successfully passed licensing, for example in Lithuania or South Africa, this not only confirms the realism of the procedure, but also can become a source of useful practical advice.

Evaluate the complexity of the regulatory system

Not all jurisdictions are equally suitable for quickly obtaining a license. Some countries have such complex requirements that it is practically impossible to significantly shorten the timelines.

For example, in the USA, licensing often involves obtaining permits in several states, which significantly complicates and prolongs the process.

If the main goal is the fastest possible market entry, it is worth choosing a jurisdiction with a simpler procedure first, and only later expanding activities to other countries. If it is necessary to work precisely in a jurisdiction with tight regulation, a preliminary analysis will help determine the most important requirements on which to focus.

Preparation of the application for obtaining a license

After studying the regulatory requirements, move on to the most important stage — the preparation of the application. Your task is to submit a complete, high-quality, and convincing package of documents on the first attempt. This is exactly what most often allows reducing the review time.

Make a detailed work plan

Break down the process into separate stages: preparation of documents, collection of information about owners and management, passing KYC procedures, opening an account, formation of the authorized capital, etc.

Assign those responsible for each task and set internal deadlines. Perceive obtaining a license as a full-fledged project with a clear implementation schedule — this will help avoid rush jobs before submitting the application.

Use ready-made templates and expert help

It is not necessary to create all documents from scratch. It is much more efficient to use professional templates of internal policies, AML/KYC procedures, and other documents, adapting them to the specifics of your business and the requirements of local legislation.

If the budget allows, it is worth involving a legal or compliance company to check the entire package of documents. Specialists can conduct a kind of “test audit” of the application, identify weak spots, and help fix them even before the regulator pays attention to them.

Formulate answers clearly and to the point

During the completion of the questionnaire or preparation of a business plan, do not limit yourself to general phrases. Each answer must demonstrate that you understand your future duties well.

For example, if it is necessary to explain how the company will ensure the safety of client assets, it is not enough to write only “we will use cold wallets.”

The following explanation will sound much more convincing:

“95% of clients’ digital assets will be stored in multi-signature cold wallets with geographic redundancy. Daily reconciliation of balances will be conducted, and the volume of funds on hot wallets will be limited only to operational needs and additionally insured.”

Clear and meaningful answers reduce the number of clarifying requests from the regulator and therefore speed up the review of the application.

Perform a final check

Before submission, carefully review the entire package of documents.

Make sure that the information is consistent: the number of predicted clients, financial indicators, transaction volumes, and other data must match in all documents.

Also check spelling, formatting, correctness of file names, and the presence of all appendices. A neatly designed application creates a positive first impression, while an untidy package of documents can cause additional checks and delays.

Check the completeness of documents

Use the official checklist of the regulator (if it is available) and make sure that all necessary documents are added to the application.

If a certain point does not apply to your company, do not leave it without explanation. It is better to add a separate note like:

“Requirement No. X does not apply because…”

This way, the expert who will review the application will immediately understand that the document was not missed by accident, but is deliberately not submitted for a justified reason.

Interaction with Regulatory Authorities

The way you build communication with the regulator can significantly affect the timeline for obtaining a license. Open, professional, and proactive interaction helps speed up the process, while weak communication often causes delays. Here are a few important recommendations.

Start the dialogue even before submitting the application

In many jurisdictions, it is possible (and even worthwhile) to hold an informal meeting or consultation with the regulator before the official submission of documents. This is a great opportunity to clarify requirements, ask questions, and receive preliminary feedback regarding non-standard aspects of your business model.

If the regulator has a fintech sandbox, an innovation hub, or another format for preliminary consultations, be sure to use it. This demonstrates the seriousness of your intentions and helps identify potential problems at an early stage.

Assign a single contact person

It is best when one responsible person communicates with the regulator — for example, a compliance officer or a legal representative of the company.

This person must know the content of the application well, respond quickly to requests, and coordinate all communication. If several employees join the correspondence at once, this can lead to confusion or contradictory answers. Instead, clear and consistent communication creates a positive impression and increases trust.

Respond quickly and completely

If the regulator reached out with a question or asked to provide additional documents, prioritize this task.

Try to respond even before the end of the established deadline. If preparing a response takes time — for example, it is necessary to develop additional documentation on cybersecurity — immediately confirm receipt of the request and, if necessary, politely ask for additional time. But if there is an opportunity, send the materials earlier.

It is important to answer all questions at once. An incomplete answer almost always means a new round of correspondence.

Build a constructive dialogue

Regulators are by their nature attentive to details and inclined to minimize risks. This is exactly what their job consists of. Therefore, sometimes their questions may seem too meticulous or repetitive.

You should not react emotionally or perceive this as mistrust. Each comprehensive answer brings you closer to obtaining a license.

If a misunderstanding has arisen, it is better to suggest a brief meeting or a call than to endlessly exchange emails.

Record all communication

Keep a log of all contacts with the regulator: when the request arrived, what exactly was asked, and when and what response you provided.

Such accounting helps control deadlines, avoid repetitions, and ensures consistency of communication, even if different representatives of the regulator work with you. In addition, an organized approach testifies to a high level of company management.

Demonstrate a culture of compliance

During all communications (written or oral), it is important to show that compliance with legal requirements is an integral part of the company’s work.

Use the terminology of regulations. For example, when answering a question regarding a certain procedure, you can state: “In accordance with Article X of the regulation on VASP, we have implemented…”.

Such formulations unobtrusively demonstrate that the company is well-oriented in regulatory requirements and operates in accordance with them.

During meetings or calls, it is desirable that key issues are commented on by a compliance officer or another specialist who confidently masters the topic. This always makes a positive impression.

Ensuring compliance

One of the most important factors for rapid license acquisition is real compliance with the regulator’s requirements, not only formally, but also in essence.

In other words, your company must look exactly how the regulator would like to see it among licensed market participants. Such an approach significantly reduces the number of remarks and accelerates decision-making.

Conduct an internal readiness audit

Before an official audit, it is worth conducting your own assessment of readiness for licensing.

It can be performed by an internal team or an independent consultant. During such an audit, internal policies, procedures, and the practical execution of requirements are checked.

By eliminating all identified deficiencies in advance, you minimize the risk that the regulator will find them during the inspection.

Prepare the business for launch

In some cases, the regulator wants to make sure that after receiving the license, the company is ready to immediately start activities.

Therefore, it is desirable that your platform is already technically ready for work, even if it is not yet accessible to the general public. For example, the trading interface should function, crypto wallets should work in test mode, and the user registration process with KYC verification should be completely set up.

The opportunity to demonstrate a finished product and integrated compliance mechanisms can shorten or even eliminate the period of operation under a conditional license.

Follow changes in legislation

Regulation of the cryptocurrency market changes very quickly.

While the review of your application is ongoing, new requirements regarding cybersecurity, FATF recommendations, or other regulatory changes may appear.

It is important to track such updates and, if necessary, immediately adapt your documents or procedures. If, during the review of the application, you show the regulator that you have already taken into account the new requirements, this will become an additional confirmation of your responsibility and will help avoid delays.

Involve specialized experts

Sometimes the fastest way to resolve a complex issue is to turn to a narrow-profile specialist.

If you are unsure about matters of tax reporting, accounting for forks, or other specific directions, an expert’s consultation can quickly eliminate the regulator’s doubts.

Such an approach demonstrates that the company does not rely on assumptions, but ensures compliance with requirements with the participation of qualified specialists.

Plan compliance even after obtaining the license

The regulator evaluates not only the current state of the company, but also how it will operate after licensing.

That is exactly why it is worth preparing a program of further compliance in advance: a plan for regular monitoring, a schedule of internal audits, mechanisms for updating policies, and continuous improvement of processes.

This shows that the company is ready not only to fulfill current requirements, but also to adapt to future legislative changes. Such a proactive approach significantly increases the regulator’s trust and contributes to a faster receipt of a positive decision.

Why Choose SBSB for VASP Licensing

The process of obtaining a VASP crypto license is much more than just preparing documents. It requires a strategic approach, a deep understanding of regulatory requirements, and practical experience working with the rules governing the virtual assets market in different countries.

Exactly such comprehensive support is offered by SBSB Fintech Lawyers. The team develops individual legal solutions that help cryptocurrency companies undergo licensing quickly, in accordance with the requirements of legislation, and with the prospect of further business scaling.

Thanks to many years of practical experience supporting applications for VASP crypto licenses in countries in Europe, Asia, and offshore jurisdictions, SBSB has built an effective work process that minimizes the risk of errors and helps reduce approval timelines.

Regardless of whether it is a crypto exchange license, registration of a custodial wallet, or a comprehensive license for activity with virtual assets, the team provides full legal support — from choosing the optimal jurisdiction and registering the company to developing AML policies and conducting communication with the regulator.

One of the key advantages of SBSB is a deep understanding of international FATF standards regarding VASP activities and the specific features of transitioning to a new licensing regime in accordance with the MiCA regulation, including the transformation from VASP status to CASP in countries of the European Union.

Lawyers help ensure compliance of all documentation, internal control systems, and corporate governance with both current and future regulatory requirements.

In addition, the international expertise of SBSB allows developing licensing strategies taking into account subsequent entry into foreign markets, European passporting opportunities, and future changes in legislation.

Choosing SBSB, a cryptocurrency business receives not just a legal consultant, but a reliable partner who understands the specifics of the industry, evaluates risks, and offers solutions calculated for long-term success in the field of virtual assets.

Official Sources & Primary Legislation (VASP / CASP)

Primary Global Standards (FATF)

European Union — MiCA (CASP) & Travel Rule

United Kingdom — FCA (AML Registration Regime)

Singapore — Monetary Authority of Singapore (Payment Services Act)

United Arab Emirates — Dubai VARA & ADGM FSRA

South Africa — FSCA (CASP licensing under FAIS)

FAQ About the VASP License

What is a VASP license, and why is it essential for my crypto business?

A VASP (Virtual Asset Service Provider) license is an official authorization that allows a company to legally offer cryptocurrency services, such as exchange, custody, and wallet solutions. Obtaining a VASP license is essential because it demonstrates regulatory compliance, protects your company from legal sanctions, helps establish trust with institutional partners, and is often a mandatory prerequisite for opening corporate bank accounts in the crypto sector.

Which business activities typically require a crypto license?

The scope of a crypto license depends on your specific business model. Generally, you will require a license if you are engaged in spot trading, order-book exchanges, brokerage, market making, custodial wallet services (safekeeping of private keys), fiat-to-crypto payment processing, issuing stablecoins, or managing tokenized securities and derivatives.

What are the key compliance requirements for maintaining a license?

Licensed firms are expected to implement a comprehensive, risk-based compliance framework. This includes robust Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorist Financing (CTF) policies, strict Know Your Customer (KYC) verification, and adherence to the FATF Travel Rule. Additionally, you must ensure data protection compliance (such as GDPR), maintain rigorous cybersecurity standards, and implement proper segregation of client assets.

How should I decide which jurisdiction is best for my crypto project?

Choosing the right jurisdiction requires balancing your strategic goals with operational costs. You should consider:

Market Access: Do you need EU passporting rights (MiCA) or are you targeting a specific domestic market (e.g., Asia, Latin America)?
Operational Overhead: Are you prepared for the costs of local substance (local office, staff, directors) required in some EU or Asian hubs, or do you prefer the lower-cost, light-touch nature of offshore jurisdictions?
Banking Friendliness: Some jurisdictions have a more mature ecosystem of crypto-friendly banks and EMIs, which is critical for long-term operational success.

Get in touch with us

You can be interested in following articles

MiCA License Deadline Has Passed: What Crypto Companies Without a CASP License Can Do Now (2026)

September 14,2026

The transition period under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)

What ESMA’s Statement Means for Crypto Companies in Europe: Practical Tips for Compliance

May 06,2026

On 17 April 2026, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)

Crypto License in Latin America (2026): A Practical Guide for Launching in El Salvador, Brazil, Argentina & Panama

April 13,2026

Introduction: Latin America and the Race for Crypto Regulation Latin

SRO License in Switzerland (2026): Requirements, Costs and How to Obtain

April 10,2026

Obtaining an SRO License in Switzerland is one of the most efficient and

How Much Does a Gambling License Cost in 2026?

February 23,2026

The cost of an online gambling license is the most significant factor in your

Why Operators are Turning to Liberia for iGaming Licensing: A Competitive Alternative to Curacao

February 03,2026

The iGaming industry is in the midst of a significant transformation. As

MiCA Regulation: New Rules and Outlook for 2026

January 29,2026

The EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) is a single EU-wide legal

US Crypto Regulations

December 15,2025

The United States represents one of the world's largest and most lucrative

The Beginner’s Guide to Online Gambling Licences: Everything You Need to Know

November 25,2025

Starting an iGaming project is no longer just about having a strong brand and

Top 5 Crypto-Friendly Jurisdictions for 2025-2026: Expert Guide by SBSB FinTech Lawyers

November 20,2025

As specialists in crypto licensing and regulation, our team at SBSB FinTech

Seychelles vs Mauritius Forex Licenses: Costs, Benefits, and Licensing Process

October 15,2025

When it comes to establishing a Forex brokerage business, one of the most

Sweden Amends Gambling Act to Crack Down on Unlicensed Operators

October 07,2025

Sweden is set to amend its Gambling Act following a report by investigator

Customer reviews

SBSB Fintech Lawyers assisted us in obtaining a crypto license in Poland. The process went smoothly, everything was done quickly and without any unnecessary headache. We will be reaching out again.

Working with SBSB Fintech Lawyers was straightforward and efficient; they assisted us in opening accounts and establishing companies in Curaçao and Costa Rica. We value their professionalism and recommend their services.

SBSB lawyers approached my request in a holistic way. In addition to securing a license in the required jurisdiction, they came up with optimum payment solutions and also helped me register new content.

We approached SBSB with a request to obtain a crypto license in Poland and open bank accounts. We would like to highlight the professionalism and client-oriented approach of the team. They offered several solutions to choose from and supported us at every stage. We are very satisfied with the service.

We worked with SBSB Fintech Lawyers on obtaining a Curaçao gambling license. The team demonstrated high competence, promptness, and attention to detail. We are satisfied with the outcome and the quality of the services provided.

The license was received on time, and even after the project completion we got legal advice on a range of issues, prompt support. A team of experts!

With SBSB's assistance, we obtained crypto licenses in the Czech Republic and Poland. Everything was at the highest level, and we continue our collaboration.

These guys are performance-focused. They prepared a ready-to-use solution particularly for my case within a short time. And they also provided advice on the appropriate policies.

Obtaining crypto licenses, white label consulting, ICO/STO, supporting NFT marketplaces, drafting policies for crypto projects, DAOs, and gamify projects

Key Advantages of a License

Access to new markets

Greater trust from clients and partners

Fewer legal risks

Easier access to banking services

Better opportunities for attracting investments and scaling

Who needs a VASP license?

Licensing in Europe

Uniform requirements across all countries

The right to operate throughout the EU

The transition period

Broadened market oversight

Choosing a European VASP License

Speed of the regulator’s work

Requirements for capital and real presence

Experience and professional environment

Language and administrative expenses

Which countries are considered the best today?

Comparison of VASP and CASP Licenses

Scope of regulation

Territory of validity of the license

Uniform rules of regulation

Comparative Table of VASP Jurisdictions

Best Jurisdictions in the World for Obtaining a VASP License

European Union (Lithuania, Estonia, and other countries)

Great Britain

Singapore

United Arab Emirates (Dubai and Abu Dhabi)

Switzerland

Offshore Jurisdictions (British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Seychelles, Panama, and others)

El Salvador

Which jurisdiction to choose?

Regulatory Requirements for Companies to Obtain a VASP License

Registered legal entity

Reliable and qualified management

AML/CFT Policies

Minimum capital and financial stability

Detailed business plan and internal documentation

IT security and cyber protection

Compliance with FATF Travel Rule

Appointment of responsible officers

Local presence

VASP license registration process

Choosing a Jurisdiction

Preparation of the Necessary Documents

Business plan and application

Internal policies

Corporate documents

Information about owners and management

Financial information

Data on the auditor and banking services

Implementation of AML/KYC Measures

Customer verification system (KYC)

Transaction monitoring

Personnel training

Practical application of procedures

Submission of application

Filing the application

Payment of fees

Confirmation of receipt of the application

Initial check of completeness

Regulatory review

Interviews and meetings

Decision on issuing a license

Ongoing compliance and reporting

Regular reporting

Continuous execution of AML/KYC requirements

Maintaining sufficient capital and financial stability

Notification of significant changes

Audits and license renewals

Relevance of internal procedures

VASP license price and investment structure

Initial VASP license cost: registration, lawyers, and document preparation

Share capital: funds that need to be confirmed

Ongoing costs after obtaining the license

Regulatory payments and license renewal

Compliance specialists

Audit and regular reporting

Office and local presence

Obtaining crypto licenses, white label consulting,
ICO/STO, supporting NFT marketplaces, drafting policies
for crypto projects, DAOs, and gamify projects